Following money leads to blind alleyBy
GLENN HENDERSONPalm Beach Post Staff Writer
Sunday, November 04, 2007
Close your eyes, concentrate hard and wrap your mind around this assumption, just for one fleeting moment:
FCATs are a valid way to measure the performance and quality of our schools, teachers and students.
Got it? Hold on to that for just a moment longer.
Martin County schools received all A's this past year on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. To wit: Martin County public schools are all top of the line.
OK. You now can relax your brain.
Now let's move on to stories by
The Palm Beach Post's Rachel Simmonsen in the past two weeks concerning strife in the school district over bonuses.
The first involves "school recognition money," which the state gives to those schools whose students perform well on FCATs.
The theory behind this goes back to former Gov. Jeb Bush and his cronies, who believed the only way to improve our schools is to dangle money in front of them as an incentive to excel.
The premise: Teachers will work harder, longer and better if they know they may get some extra cash in their paychecks.
Sounds simple, but as we can see, something has been lost in the translation.
Plenty of hard feelings were leftSimmonsen described conflict at Warfield Elementary School in Indiantown, where teachers and noninstructional staffers bitterly disputed how to split the $60,000 awarded to the school.
They grappled with a dilemma repeated at schools elsewhere in Martin County and all over the state: Should teachers get all the money? What about teachers who weren't there last year? What about office staffers or even janitors: They keep the school clean, but does that affect FCAT performance?
The debate finally was resolved with most of the money going to teachers. But plenty of hard feelings were left.
"It was a side of people I've never seen," the assistant principal said.
"I never thought money could divide this staff," an office worker said.
But the nastiness doesn't end there.
Simmonsen also wrote about similar issues with the Special Teachers Are Rewarded program, yet another way for state education officials to bait teachers with bonus money, instead of merely giving them a bigger paycheck.
'Rich' schools get the most cashThe district's "best" teachers share bonus money based on a complicated assessment of student performance - there's that FCAT again - and personal evaluations. But here arise more questions: How do you rate teachers fairly when their students vary so greatly from subject to subject, school to school?
And what about teachers whose students don't take FCATs? In Martin County's case, a bizarre districtwide test is crafted in each subject area that supposedly provides a level playing field to gauge performance.
But it doesn't work; wealthier schools almost always have an advantage. Teachers at "rich" schools usually get the most cash.
That might help explain why this year's districtwide teacher of the year, who also teaches at Warfield, somehow didn't qualify for STAR money.
We have in our schools a system that spreads money in many ways based on FCATs - those very same tests that supposedly show our Martin County schools are as good as they can be. After all, what's better than an A?
Let's wrap our minds around those two inconsistencies. In one instance, the FCAT-weighted system is supposed to be the best way to appraise our schools. At the same time, it's not a valid way to appraise our teachers.
Clearly, something doesn't add up.
___________________________________
Read the article on palmbeachpost.com.
http://tinyurl.com/yqe2q4